AUTISM & THE ENVIRONMENT

BUT DOES IT MAKE SENSE THAT VACCINE-BASED TOXICITY
WOULD NOT CAUSE AUTISM WHILE AIR POLLUTION WOULD?

Autism Pollution

  It’s a fair question; how can the metallic toxicity found in virtually all VACCINES (ALUMINUM & MERCURY) — FLU VACCINES INCLUDED — not be related to AUTISM, while the metallic toxicity found in traffic-related or industrial air pollution, even though identical in numerous ways, is?  I asked a similar question one year ago after experts declared pollution to be the world’s number one cause of death (HERE).  We’ll tackle it in a bit more depth today.

Just two short weeks ago, after looking at 132,256 Vancouver births and following them to age five, JAMA Pediatrics (Association of Prenatal Exposure to Air Pollution With Autism Spectrum Disorder) concluded, “In a population-based birth cohort, we detected an association between exposure to nitric oxide and autism spectrum disorders.”  The fall issue of the journal Environmental Epidemiology concluded similarly.  Should we be surprised?  After looking at the body of work on this subject, how could you be, especially with ASD (autism spectrum disorders) being linked to other forms of pollution, namely pesticides / herbicides (HERE)?  For those who are interested, here are some CHERRY-PICKED tidbits from related research that have been published over the course of the past half decade.

Honestly, I could have given you dozens of others, but the point is simple; how can there be so much evidence that metallic particulate air pollution is ONE OF SEVERAL PROVEN CAUSES OF AUTISM, yet when the same toxic metals — metals found almost universally in vaccines — are studied, experts always conclude that there is no relationship?  This despite jammed message boards, hundreds of websites, and an almost innumerable number of personal testimonies attesting to the opposite.  Unfortunately, simply questioning this paradox will earn you the label antivaxxer, even though VACCINE DAMAGE DENIAL is arguably a more common phenomenon.  Allow me to make a few observations.

First, when you look at the last quote above, you’ll notice that it has a short list of the most common, highly toxic, metallic pollutants, which includes lead (which everyone recognizes as a poison), mercury (which has been called the most toxic non-radioactive metal on earth and is commonly found in vaccines in the form of a compound called thimerosal) and aluminum (the metal used as an ADJUVANT in vaccines to purposefully create inflammation / neuro-inflammation because bacteria and viruses alone don’t create enough antibodies to be considered effective).  For instance, plug in the term “aluminum particulate air pollution” and you’ll find enough material to keep you reading for months.  Now do a similar search with the terms aluminum vaccine.  Just remember that the rest of the world refers to aluminum as aluminium, spelled with two i’s instead of just one.

Secondly, I think the studies showing that metallic particulate pollution is adversely affecting prenatal / infantile TESTOSTERONE levels are spot on, which is the most logical reason that autism is a male-dominated condition.  Throw in the whole ENDOCRINE-DISRUPTOR factor and you can start to see the train coming off the rails. 

The December 2017 issue of Environmental Health Reports (Potential Sex Differences Relative to Autism Spectrum Disorder and Metals) concluded that, “Sex differences in ASD diagnosis and mutagenic effects of toxic exposures indicate that sex differences may play a major part in the causal relationship of any potential associations seen…. We also found several studies investigating associations between ASD and metals exposures, including 11 on aluminum, 6 on antimony, 15 on arsenic, 5 on beryllium, 17 on cadmium, 11 on chromium, 25 on lead, 14 on manganese, and 13 on nickel with markers of exposure in hair, urine, blood, teeth, fingernails, and air pollution. Based on our examination of existing literature, the current evidence warrants a considerable need for evaluations of sex differences in future studies assessing the association between metals exposures and ASD.”  And while many would argue against it in knee-jerk fashion, I have to wonder if this issue could be playing a role in the Western world’s exploding gender dysphoria?

Thirdly, when you see titles such as this one (Autism Spectrum Disorder Prevalence and Associations with Air Concentrations of Lead, Mercury, and Arsenic), authored by thirteen researchers from eight universities across the United States, including Johns Hopkins, it becomes increasingly difficult to argue against.  Without ever addressing aluminum, the July 2016 issue of Environmental Monitoring and Assessment concluded……

Lead, mercury, and arsenic are neurotoxicants with known effects on neurodevelopment. Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder apparent by early childhood. Using data on 4486 children with ASD residing in 2489 census tracts in five sites of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring (ADDM) Network, we used multi-level negative binomial models to investigate if ambient lead, mercury, and arsenic concentrations, as measured by the US Environmental Protection Agency National-Scale Air Toxics Assessment (EPA-NATA), were associated with ASD prevalence.  After adjusting for confounding factors, tracts with air concentrations of lead in the highest quartile had significantly higher ASD prevalence than tracts with lead concentrations in the lowest quartile. In addition, tracts with mercury concentrations above the 75th percentile and arsenic concentrations below the 75th percentile had a significantly higher ASD prevalence. Our results demonstrate that exposure to multiple metals may have synergistic effects on ASD prevalence.

And lastly, what about the whole INFLAMMATION / MICROGLIA connection?  The January issue of Experimental Neurology (Beyond Infection: Maternal Immune Activation by Environmental Factors, Microglial Development, and Relevance for Autism Spectrum Disorders), which was a collaboration between scientists from Duke, Harvard, and Cal-Irvine helped shed some light.  Here is the cherry-picked abstract….

“Immune molecules such as cytokines and chemokines [inflammation] and the cells that produce them within the brain, notably microglia, are critical for normal brain development. This recognition has in recent years led to the working hypothesis that inflammatory events during pregnancy, e.g. in response to infection, may disrupt the normal expression of immune molecules during critical stages of neural development and thereby contribute to the risk for neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Subsequent studies by many labs – in humans and in non-human animal models – have supported the hypothesis that ongoing disrupted immune molecule expression and/or neuroinflammation contributes to at least a significant subset of ASD. The heterogeneous clinical and biological phenotypes observed in ASD strongly suggest that in genetically susceptible individuals, environmental risk factors combine or synergize to create a tipping or threshold point for dysfunction. Importantly, animal studies showing a link between maternal immune activation (MIA) and ASD-like outcomes in offspring involve different species and diverse environmental factors associated with ASD in humans, beyond infection, including toxin exposures, maternal stress, and maternal obesity, all of which impact inflammatory or immune pathways.”

This means that if your immune system, whether in the brain or second brain —- the Gut (remember that 80% of the immune system is FOUND IN THE GUT) — becomes “activated” and starts cranking out the chemical messengers we collectively refer to as inflammation; we cannot be surprised that IF MOM IS PREGNANT, bad things are much more likely to happen to junior, whether he’s still in the womb or out. 

What are the factors these authors specifically list as far as immune system activation is concerned?  How about INFECTIONS (or HERE)?  What about OBESITY, which is itself considered inflammatory?  We’ve already dealt with environmental issues such as pollution (yes, CIGARETTES count), but what about MATERNAL STRESS, which was also mentioned?  However, in relationship to today’s post, where the rubber meets the road is exposure to toxins.  Again, my point is simple.  Isn’t it downright suspicious that scores of studies have proved that EPIGENETICALLY SUSCEPTIBLE infants, whether born or unborn, are getting metal-induced autism via pollution, but not via vaccines —- even though we are talking about the very same metals in vaccines, namely aluminium and mercury?  I would argue that this is more proof of still another coverup in the long line of coverups we see every day in MONEY-BASED MEDICINE.

When it comes to autism, are metals in polluted air a bigger deal than metals in vaccines; especially if like myself and a huge portion of our population, you live in RURAL AREAS that have virtually zero particulate air pollution?  It’s a question you’ll have to answer, not only for your own health, but for the health of your family.  In the spirit of the holidays, allow me to give you a completely free gift —- my post on what it takes to start the process of diminishing systemic inflammation (HERE it is).  And if you thought  today’s article was worthwhile, be sure and show us some love on FACEBOOK, as liking, sharing, or following is an excellent way to reach those you care about mos

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *