We live in a battleground — a battleground of narratives and ideas. Control the narrative, you control how people think. The decisions they make. What they will open their wallet for.
Question the narrative — or even more importantly, the motivation for promoting certain narratives — and you put yourself at risk of being canceled. A societal outcast. A professional pariah.
Nowhere is this more evident than in the world of VACCINE RESEARCH. And in the world of vaccine research, nowhere is it more evident than with covid. Failing to toe the line (uphold the narrative) can get you blacklisted, no matter how elite a physician or researcher you are or what kind of credentials you have.
Narratives don’t appear from thin air.
Case in point; back in the early days of the pandemic, President Donald Trump was savaged for both taking Hydroxychloroquine himself and publicly suggesting it could be “a game changer” in the war on Covid-19 — a disease that at the time we knew almost nothing about. Whether you approve or disapprove, wouldn’t it be helpful to know where this narrative came from?
In 2005 a group of CDC scientists were working on finding a solution for SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV). They succeeded, seemingly beyond anyone’s wildest expectations. Published in BMC’s Virology Journal, the study (Chloroquine is a Potent Inhibitor of SARS Coronavirus Infection and Spread) came to conclusions that at least on the surface would seemingly be relevant to our present situation…..
Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is an emerging disease that was first reported in Guangdong Province, China, in late 2002. The disease rapidly spread to at least 30 countries within months of its first appearance, and concerted worldwide efforts led to the identification of the etiological agent as SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV), a novel member of the family Coronaviridae…. No effective prophylactic or post-exposure therapy is currently available. We report, however, that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage. CONCLUSION: Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in cell culture……
Interesting, but what does that have to do with today’s topic — graphene and the increasing speculation that it might be an off-label ingredient of the mRNA covid vaccines? Simple. Wouldn’t it be helpful to figure out where this narrative came from, as well as why growing numbers of people are wondering? These questions are especially relevant considering recent research using advanced chemical assays and analysis suggests that graphene is, or at the very least, is “likely” present.
What’s true, what’s speculation, and maybe most importantly, if it is true, what are the possible implications? In other words, if true, it’s important we understand the why or motivation behind it. We have to understand the narrative.
To get there from here, let’s start with some basics.
What is Graphene?
Graphene comes from the common/abundant mineral, graphite (pencil lead). Wikipedia says this of graphite. “Graphite is a crystalline form of the element carbon and is the most stable form of carbon under standard conditions. Under high pressures and temperatures it converts to diamond. It is a good conductor of heat and electricity, which makes it useful in electronic products such as electrodes, batteries, and solar panels.”
According to an article by Inmesol (Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov, the Fathers of Graphene), the Russian Research duo — a former professor at Moscow Institute of Physics & Technology (Dr. Geim) and his star pupil (Dr. Novoselov) — were working together at England’s Manchester University, when they made their 2004 discovery. Their discovery of graphene was considered important enough in the scientific community to earn the pair the 2010 Nobel Prize for Physics.
How did they do it? They simply put duct tape on graphite, and peeled away layers (“laminae“) that were a single atom thick. That’s right; graphene is very thin graphite.
Why does an almost two decade old discovery continue to provide big news across the whole of the scientific community? To answer this question we must first understand graphene’s extraordinary physical properties. According to a September 2021 article from MetalTech News (Scientists Report Graphene Breakthroughs)……
The explosion of scientific research into the properties and potential benefits of graphene since the material was first identified nearly two decades ago continues to yield substantial results. The carbon-based wonder material is believed to have almost limitless potential. It is the thinnest material known to man, so thin that it is considered two-dimensional. Graphene is also the strongest material ever measured, 100-300 times stronger than steel; the best conductor of electricity, approaching the performance of a superconducting material at room temperature; the best conductor of heat, even better than diamond which is also a carbon material; and nearly transparent (when in a perfect single layer of carbon atoms).
Because of these attributes graphene has a dual relevance to today’s discussion.
Not only is graphene replacing silicon as the basis for computer chips and other electronic applications, but it is foundational in the world of nanotechnology. Science continues to reveal graphene to be the perfect material for both producing infinitesimally small computer circuitry and integrating it and/or other substances/materials into biological systems.
Two months prior to the aforementioned Nobel Prize, a June 8, 2010 press release from the Georgia Institute of Technology (Scientists Strive to Replace Silicon with Graphene on Nanocircuitry) described relevant research published in the journal, Science…..
Scientists have made a breakthrough toward creating nanocircuitry on graphene, widely regarded as the most promising candidate to replace silicon as the building block of transistors. They have devised a simple and quick one-step process based on thermochemical nanolithography (TCNL) for creating nanowires, tuning the electronic properties of reduced graphene oxide on the nanoscale and thereby allowing it to switch from being an insulating material to a conducting material.
Conductivity; the level of ease that electrical current can pass through a chemical or compound, is a critical part of what makes graphene so special. Hold on to the idea of graphene being an excellent conductor of electricity because it will come up again.
What are Vaccine Adjuvants?
Germs in vaccines (virus or bacteria) are not typically enough to cause ample immune system response on their own. Thus, an adjuvant is needed to ramp up or “activate” said response. Because inflammation is an immune system reaction provoked by various sorts of tissue or cellular damage (HERE), chemical additives are put in vaccines to intentionally cause inflammation and “BOOST” immune system response to various antigens, thereby heightening the production of antibodies to work against them.
But it’s not as easy as it sounds….. Adjuvant function must operate in the proverbial “Goldilocks Zone”.
Too little inflammation, and the response is not “robust”. Too much, and the number of potential over-reactions (adverse events) is almost limitless. The amount of inflammation created by an adjuvant must be ‘just right‘. Although there are many different vaccine adjuvants used to create this inflammation, the most common, often referred to as “THE UNIVERSAL VACCINE ADJUVANT,” is the highly toxic/neurotoxic element, aluminum.
The History of Research Surrounding Graphene in Vaccines
What I first noticed as I started trying to answer this question (“is there graphene in the covid vaccines?“) was the sheer number of scientific studies pertaining to just that; “Graphene in Vaccines” (HERE ARE THE RESULTS OF THE PUBMED SEARCH) (SAME SEARCH WITH THE WORD “COVID” ADDED). 106 studies in the first group and nearly 40 in the second. I also stumbled across dozens of studies pertinent to the topic, but did not show up in the search. The next thing I noticed was that not all of the studies pertained to graphene as an adjuvant, but instead to its use as a “carrier”.
The June of 2020 the journal, Acta Biomaterialia, carried a Chinese study titled Recent Progress of Graphene Oxide as a Potential Vaccine Carrier and Adjuvant. From the abstract…..
Graphene oxide, widely employed for the delivery of biomolecules, excels in loading and delivering antigen and shows the potentiality of activating the immune system. However, graphene oxide aggregates in biological liquid and induces cell death, and it also exhibits poor biosolubility and biocompatibility. To address these limitations, various surface modification protocols have been employed to integrate aqueous compatible substances with graphene oxide to effectively improve its biocompatibility. More importantly, these modifications render functionalized-graphene oxide with superior properties as both carriers and adjuvants.
Almost two years ago, the journal, Nano Today, said this of graphene, while attempting to answer a question via a study’s title; a question similar to and seemingly no more controversial than the ’05 CDC research we discussed earlier pertaining to hydroxychloroquine — Can Graphene Take Part in the Fight Against COVID-19?
We should however point out that in vivo toxicity of graphene is still a matter of debate. Graphene materials can cross biological barriers but are less cytotoxic toward macrophages, important cells for immunological response, compared with other carbon nanomaterials. Conclusions on graphene toxicity are however made difficult due to the infinite combinations of dose, surface chemistry, and exposure route used for the evaluation. Its instability and aggregation in solution are further problems, given the mandatory stability required for drugs and vaccine storage prior use….. Further research is undoubtedly required but we foresee that graphene may have a leading role in the world’s fight against COVID-19.
In July of 2021, Frontiers of Immunology (a journal largely devoted to various diseases and the vaccines associated with them) published a research collaboration from scientists around the globe titled The Spike of SARS-CoV-2: Uniqueness and Applications, saying this of transistors & biosensors made from graphene….
In another approach, graphene-based field-effect transistor (FET) biosensing-coated antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 S protein exhibited high sensitivity to nasopharyngeal swab. FET based biosensing has several advantages, such as instantaneous measurements at low concentrations, which make it ultrasensitive and a promising candidate for on-site detections.
I will admit that when I see words like ‘biosensor‘ and ‘transistor‘ in the same sentence, and it pertains to ‘detecting’ something inside my body so that someone somewhere can read said data electronically, I’m led to ask yet another question. In fact, the conclusions of a 2018 study from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience (Interfacing Graphene-Based Materials With Neural Cells) may lead you to ask it yourself (‘How far can this process be taken, and what’s the end-game — where do the people funding this research ultimately want to go with it?)……. Pay attention to the words “conductivity” & “excitability” as we will continue touching on this characteristic of graphene.
Graphene can be exploited as a substrate for tissue engineering. In this case, conductivity is probably the most relevant amongst the various properties of the different graphene materials, as it may allow to instruct and interrogate neural networks, as well as to drive neural growth and differentiation, which holds a great potential in regenerative medicine. In this review, we try to give a comprehensive view of the accomplishments and new challenges of the field, as well as which in our view are the most exciting directions to take in the immediate future. These include the need to engineer multifunctional nanoparticles (NPs) able to cross the blood-brain-barrier to reach neural cells, and to achieve on-demand delivery of specific drugs. We describe the state-of-the-art use of graphene materials to engineer three-dimensional scaffolds to drive neuronal growth and regeneration in vivo, and the possibility of using graphene as a component of hybrid composites/multi-layer organic electronics devices. Last but not least, we address the need of an accurate theoretical modeling of the interface between graphene and biological material, by modeling the interaction of graphene with proteins and cell membranes at the nanoscale, and describing the physical mechanism(s) of charge transfer by which the various graphene materials can influence the excitability and physiology of neural cells.
Before we move on to the next section, it’s important to realize that when it comes to putting graphene into biological systems, it’s not all peaches and cream. This study from the October 2016 issue of Particle & Fibre Toxicology (Toxicity of Graphene-Family Nanoparticles: A General Review of the Origins and Mechanisms)
hopefully doubtfully tempered some of the orgasmic giddiness over introducing graphene into humans. For the record I found several studies on graphene toxicology/toxicity.
Due to their unique physicochemical properties, graphene-family nanomaterials (GFNs) are widely used in many fields, especially in biomedical applications. Currently, many studies have investigated the biocompatibility and toxicity of GFNs in vivo and in intro. Generally, GFNs may exert different degrees of toxicity in animals or cell models by following with different administration routes and penetrating through physiological barriers, subsequently being distributed in tissues or located in cells…. We also point out that various factors determine the toxicity of GFNs including the lateral size, surface structure, functionalization, charge, impurities, aggregations, and corona effect etc. In addition, several typical mechanisms underlying GFN toxicity have been revealed…..
Where do we go from here? Down the rabbit hole, of course. Into a world where reality is increasingly difficult to distinguish from science-fiction…….
Research on Graphene, Nanotechnology, Computer Chips, Artificial Intelligence & Self-Assembly/Self Replication in Biological Systems:
What is artificial intelligence or A.I.? Simple; it pertains to computer programs that can “learn” and write other computer programs or re-write themselves. Many of the all-time great sci-fi movies are based on A.I. run amok — Terminator, The Matrix, and if you’re old like me, 1968’s 2001 A Space Odyssey.
Twelve years ago this month, the site Nanowerk (Future Bio-nanotechnology Will use Computer Chips Inside Living Cells) said this of integrating computer technology into biological systems, and was based on a study published one month earlier in the journal Nano Micro Small (Intracellular Silicon Chips in Living Cells)….
Continuing miniaturization has moved the semiconductor industry well into the nano realm with leading chip manufacturers on their way to CMOS (complementary metal–oxide–semiconductors) using 22nm process technology. With transistors the size of tens of nanometers, researchers in the field of nanobiotechnology have begun to explore the interface of biology and electronics by integrating nanoelectronic components and living cells. A typical human cell is the size of about 10 square micrometers which means that hundreds of today’s smallest transistors could fit inside a single cell. If the current rate of miniaturization continues, by 2020 approximately 2,500 transistors – equivalent to microprocessors of the first generation of personal computers – could fit into the area of a typical living cell.
Over a decade later, studies show that graphene has exceeded speculation, VASTLY INCREASING COMPUTING SPEEDS — OVER 1,000 TIMES FASTER — and given us the world’s first 2nm chip (HERE). But it’s not stopping there — or even slowing down. Three years ago the website Fanatical Futurist (American Researchers Unveil the World’s First Liquid Computer Chip) said this of the chip research that was taking place in 2019; specifically chips made with graphene (I removed the numerous links to the relevant studies — see the original if interested)…..
Over the past few years there have been a growing number of experts voicing concerns that Moore’s Law, and the age of silicon computing, is coming to an end as it gets more difficult and more expensive to grind out smaller and smaller transistor sizes. And that’s despite the fact that we already have 5nm, 1nm, 0.5nm and even virus sized and single atom sized transistors being developed in the labs.
There are new staggeringly powerful computing technologies already emerging including quantum computers, that are 100 million times faster than today’s computers, neuromorphic computers that can pack all the power of today’s supercomputers into a package the size of a fingernail and revolutionize AI by learning for themselves, as well as more exotic biological, chemical, DNA computers that have been shown capable of packing the power of all of today’s global computing power into a test tube, and liquid computers. And all that’s for starters.
Before we continue, let’s do one more internet search; this one for “study self-organizing self-assembling graphene A.I. biosensor“. The following are either study titles or the titles of the press releases for said studies. For the record, I found such an overwhelming amount of information that I could easily have given you hundreds of similar….
- Self-Replicating RNA Vaccine Delivery to Dendritic Nerve Cells
- Artificial Intelligence Accelerators Based on Graphene Optoelectronic Devices
- Graphene Muscle with Artificial Intelligence
- Controlling Graphene-Bio Interface: Dispersions in Animal Sera for Enhanced Stability and Reduced Toxicity
- Intra-body Nano-network: A Brief Summary
- Endotoxin-Free Preparation of Graphene Oxide and Graphene-based Materials for Biological Applications
- Using Life’s Building Blocks To Control Nanoparticle Assembly
- Inbrain Neuroelectronics Secures Funding for AI-powered Graphene-Brain Interface
- Sodium Implantation Induce Cytocompatibility of Shape-Controlled Three-dimensional Self-assembly Graphene
- Self-assembly and Ion Transport Behaviour of Liquid-crystalline Graphene Oxide Multilayer Sandwich Nanopapers
- Penn State University: 2D Layered Devices can Self-assemble with Precision
- Highly Sensitive Graphene Biosensor by Monomolecular Self-assembly of Receptors on Graphene Surface
- Graphene- and Graphene Oxide-Based Nanocomposite Platforms for Electrochemical Biosensing Applications
- Self-Assembling Peptides and Carbon Nanomaterials Join Forces for Innovative Biomedical Applications
- New Graphene-based Material Self-assembles Into Vascular Structures
- Interfacial Self-Assembly to Spatially Organize Graphene Oxide Into Hierarchical and Bioactive Structures
- Self-assembly of Graphene Oxide and Cellulose Nanocrystals into Continuous Filament via Interfacial Nanoparticle Complexation
- Self-Assembled Graphene Hydrogel via a One-Step Hydrothermal Process
- Self-assembly of Graphene Ribbons by Spontaneous Self-tearing and Peeling from a Substrate
- Creating an A.I. Ecosystem for Graphene
- Fundamentals of Electromagnetic Nanonetworks in the Terahertz Band
- Deep Learning Tests Billions of Graphene Combos in Two Days
- Graphene-based 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: Fabrication, Applications, and Future Scope in Liver Tissue Engineering
- Single-Layered Graphene as Potential Artificial Robotic Skin
- Growing Graphene – Blue Sky Research Co. Attempts to Replicate Nature
- Kinematic self-replication in Reconfigurable Organisms
- Applications of Graphene and Graphene Oxide in Smart Drug/Gene Delivery: Is the World Still Flat?
- The Manufacture of Unbreakable Bionics via Multifunctional and Self-Healing Silk–Graphene Hydrogels
- Self-Assembly and Nanotechnology: A Force Balance Approach (1st Edition)
- PRESS-RELEASES FOR A SINGLE STUDY: First Living, Spontaneously Self-Replicating Robots Likely To Be Used in Future Vaccines (World’s First Living Robots can now Reproduce, Scientists Say) (DARPA Funded Research Helps Team of Scientists Create Xenobots – World’s First A.I.-Designed, Self-Replicating Living Robots) (Scientists use A.I. to Design Self-replicating Xenobots from Frog Cells)
- Graphene Active Sensor Arrays for Long-term and Wireless Mapping of Wide Frequency Band Epicortical Brain Activity
- Graphene-Based Sensors for Human Health Monitoring
- Are Graphene and Graphene-derived Products Capable of Preventing COVID-19 Infection?
- Self-Assembled Magnetic Nanoparticle–Graphene Oxide Nanotag for Optomagnetic Detection of DNA
- Human Virus Detection with Graphene-based Materials
- Graphene Biosensors for Bacterial and Viral Pathogens
- A Review on the Development of Tunable Graphene Nanoantennas for Terahertz Optoelectronic and Plasmonic Applications
- Advances in Microwave-Assisted Production of Reduced Graphene Oxide
- Viability of Neural Cells on 3D Printed Graphene Bioelectronics
- Self-Healing Graphene
- Far too many others to list, but since Elon Musk is in the news cycle (there are rumors swirling that he wants to buy Twitter), be sure to check out his NEURALINK and STARLINK technologies.
Surprised? Shocked? Feel like you’ve been living under a rock (like me)? Realize, however, that the ‘science’ taking place in this field is undoubtedly even crazier than it appears from the list above. For example, our military (and who knows how many of the massive tech companies working with them) has technology — advanced technology — that you will not learn about until at least a decade after the fact — if you ever learn about it at all.
Which brings us to the crux of the issue; our attempt to answer the question posed by the title of today’s post……
What Evidence (if any) Exists that Graphene Nano-Technology Could Potentially be Found in the mRNA Covid Vaccines?
Even though we touched on it earlier; because it is pertinent to answering this question. it’s important to grasp the brutal nature of cancel culture, realizing it’s NOTHING NEW in the world of ‘off-narrative’ vaccine research.
If you think that renowned Texas cardiologist, DR PETER McCULLOUGH, made a good career move by bringing covid vaccine controversies to light, think again. His business and professional status have suffered, will suffer, and will continue to suffer because of it.
Bucking up against Big Pharma and the money and power behind it is a losing proposition. Don’t misunderstand me. I’m not saying that he or the myriad of others doing similar are wrong; just the opposite. But if you think that speaking out has helped them professionally, sitting down with Dr. M’s wife over a cup of tea would probably be a revelation.
Also understand that in our new era of RAMPANT AND OUT-IN-THE-OPEN-IN-YOUR-FACE GOVERNMENT-LED CENSORSHIP OF HEALTH-RELATED INFORMATION (particularly all things covid); unbridled “fact-checking” and the subsequent labeling of scientists or academics who author off-narrative papers as “spreaders of disinformation,” is usually the best proof that the censored information is at least in the ballpark. And frequently directly over the target.
Let’s now head across the ocean to Spain’s University of Almeria, located in a city of 200,000 on the shores of the Mediterranean.
Dr Pablo Campra Madrid is a chemist/biologist who teaches and researches in their agriculture department. Because it is relevant to his particular area of expertise, for the past four years he has also worked for ENEA (Rome, Italy) in the MICRO-RAMAN spectroscopic analysis of the structure of water and its subsequent purification — a process made simple to understand in this BRIEF BUT PERTINENT SYNOPSIS OF A DOCTORAL DISSERTATION I came across. As you may have suspected, Raman spectroscopy IS ALSO USED FOR DETECTING/ANALYZING GRAPHENE.
In October of last year, Campra and his team published the first of four studies as part of their Counteranalysis of Covid Vaccines Project. Interestingly, his team named itself The Fifth Column or ‘La Quinta Columna’ due to censorship and an inability to find a journal willing to go thru the peer-review process with their work (their website is massive but is entirely in Spanish). Each study below has an abstract and numerous (shocking) pictures…….
- OCTOBER 2021: Microscopic Objects Frequently Observed in mRNA Covid Vaccines (PDF)
- NOVEMBER 2021: Microstructures in Covid19 Vaccines; Inorganic Crystals or Wireless Nanosensor Network? (PDF)
- NOVEMBER 2021: Detection of Graphene in Covid19 Vaccines (PDF) Interim Report from June 2021 (PDF)
- FEBRUARY 2022: DNA Nanotechnology Crystals in Covid19 Vaccines (PDF)
I must admit that I am not quite sure what to say about these studies other than to urge you to take a look for yourself. In this case pictures really are worth a thousand words.
The Fifth Column’s founder, Dr Richard Delgado Martin (biologist, bio-statastician, post-grad in epidemiology, immunology, and microbiology), along with Dr Campra, have numerous articles / video interviews presenting their findings and providing very specific examples of the bullets above, which, thanks to MSM censorship, can only be found on ‘alternative’ websites.
More recently, a British physician took some covid mRNA vaccine to an independent lab to have it assayed. HERE is a synopsis because the FULL REPORT (Qualitative Evaluation of Inclusions In Moderna, AstraZeneca and Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccines) is rather long. As you might assume, it was determined that the vaccines contain graphene. Another Brit, Dr Robert Young (a naturopath of some renowned), also published a paper that came to similar conclusions (HERE). And not to be outdone, several teams of scientists from both New Zealand and Australia HAVE DISCOVERED THE SAME THING.
The Curious Case of Dr Andreas Noack
While on this topic, let’s not forget the too-implausible-to-believe death of German nano-chemist, Dr Andreas Noack, who suffered what was officially called a heart attack mere hours after revealing, via a live-streamed video, that he had discovered graphene hydrogels in the mRNA covid vaccine using technology similar to Campra’s team. He died four days later, leaving behind an extremely pregnant ‘life partner’ and far more questions than answers.
Noack was both eccentric and a member of what many (self included) would label a religious cult. To muddy the waters even further, his wife has publicly stated that his heart attack was the result of him being hit with some sort of “top secret” microwave weapon (a DEW); something she says he warned her might happen before making his findings public.
In THIS VIDEO (with English subtitles and a transcript) you can watch Dr Noack discussing his finding graphene hydrogels in the vaccines (he sometimes erroneously refers to these as ‘graphene hydroxide‘) and likening said findings (sheets of graphene 50 nm long, .1 nm or 1 atom thick) to “carbon razor blades“. He went on to make the claim, “I am a specialist in activated carbon. In my doctoral thesis [1995 at Germany’s Darmstadt Technical University] I converted graphene oxide to graphene hydroxide“. True? False? Hype? Misrepresentation? I’m not really sure.
Should we throw the baby out with the bathwater because an individual does not, in certain ways, conform to societal norms? Maybe. It’s a question that you’ll have to answer for yourself — but feel free to GET SOME HELP FROM OUR GOVERNMENT. What’s undeniable, however, that at least “back-in-the-day,” Dr Noack was unarguably one of the world’s leading experts in the carbon nanotechnology arena. A snippet of A 2007 FLYER for a presentation Noack was giving on nutrition stated (translated from German and verified via a patent search under his name — I found over sixty applications)….
Dr. Noack has applied for almost 30 patents to date and is considered one of the most active German patent applicants in the field of nanotechnology.
Biological evolution takes place over generations. But imagine if it could be expedited beyond the incremental change envisaged by Darwin to a matter of individual experience. Transhumanism is rooted in the belief that humans can and will be enhanced by the genetic engineering and information technology of today, as well as anticipated advances, such as bioengineering, artificial intelligence, and molecular nanotechnology. The result is an iteration of Homo sapiens enhanced or augmented, but still fundamentally human. – From the website of the WEF (What is Transhumanism and How Does it Affect You?)
Executive Order  directs BARDA, CDC, NIH, and FDA to accelerate the adoption of improved influenza vaccine technologies. In alignment with the goals of the Executive Order, NIAID is conducting and supporting research to develop state-of-the-art vaccine platform technologies that could be used to develop universal influenza vaccines as well as to improve the speed and agility of the influenza vaccine manufacturing process. These platform technologies include DNA, messenger RNA (mRNA), virus-like particles, vector-based, and self-assembling nanoparticle vaccines. – From an article on Donald J Trump’s Executive Order on Modernizing Influenza Vaccines in the United States to Promote National Security and Public Health. The EO was signed the day after EVENT 201 and just weeks before we started hearing about a new strain of ‘flu’ coming out of China.
Functionalized Graphene Oxide Serves as a Novel Vaccine Nano-adjuvant for Robust Stimulation of Cellular Immunity. -The title of a six year old study from from the journal, Nanoscale. This has to do with PEG & graphene; something I will address momentarily.
Despite the protests of the fact-checkers (they’ve been working double-overtime on this subject), it appears as likely as not that graphene is an “off-label” ingredient in at least some of these vaccines (it is considered a proprietary trade secret).
I used the word “some” because it is becoming increasingly apparent that different batches of vaccine from the same manufacturers are not identical as per their ingredients, namely the active ingredient, mRNA — HERE & HERE). If true — and CONSIDERING PAST HISTORY IN THIS AREA — we certainly can’t be surprised. Don’t lose track, however, that ultimately we are trying to answer a bigger question….
Why might certain persons or entities be interested in or benefit from putting graphene into the covid vaccines?
And maybe even more importantly, why might they wish to do this in such an opaque manner — without letting the public know about it or labeling it as such? Answering this question is made doubly difficult considering that every passing day gives us a front row seat to a mounting cornucopia of scientific evidence exposing the official narrative spun by the government and industry as (ahem) less than accurate — and in many cases, seemingly deliberately so (HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE & HERE are some of the experts I follow who have been brutalized by the MSM via GOVERNMENT-SPONSORED CENSORSHIP).
Once you know how things have worked in the flu vaccine industry for the past thirty or so years, the official narrative becomes, if it’s possible, even more difficult to swallow.
The fact that covid mRNA vaccines have become the poster children for ‘the law of diminishing returns‘ and SHRINKING VE, (dwindling vaccine efficacy is something we should in no way be surprised by considering this has been the STATUS QUO for flu vaccines for decades — HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, and HERE, INCLUDING 16% VE THIS SEASON), makes the lack of transparency from big pharma and the alphabet soup of government watchdog organizations who are supposed be monitoring them, all the more troubling. It almost sounds like….. (gulp / whisper) a conspiracy theory.
Have you ever wondered how “conspiracy theories” are cultivated? Simple……
Openly lie to the public and tell them that that not only is a certain story false, it is intentionally false. Control the story by slow-rolling and stonewalling it in the press. Or better yet, simply ignore and/or censor it, leaving it to be covered only by seedy, conspiracy-minded and “discredited” right-wing websites and personalities (can anyone say Alex Jones?). Be sure to get numerous “experts” with “credentials” to agree that the story is fake news by repeatedly ‘fact-checking’ it, and then attack it publicly as ‘disinformation’. Or better yet, suggest that it’s a nasty smear campaign by anti-science/anti-vaxx wackos. And then, when the story is finally too big, with too much evidence to contain or ignore; get ahead of it by admitting yes, it’s true, but no longer meaningful. Yesterday’s news — so old that the point is irrelevant to the “important” crises facing us today.
Is there a better example of a ‘conspiracy theory’ becoming ‘conspiracy fact’ right before our very eyes than the infamous Hunter laptop scandal (HERE, HERE & HERE)? Unfortunately, we have all, to varying degrees, become “Comfortably Numb” to this phenomenon.
Shady stories involving government officials and unfathomable amounts of money & influence have become the norm both in the United States as well as globally (HERE is a current example). Almost nowhere is this seen more clearly than in the world of academic medicine and biomedical research.
Thinking about today’s post in light of LAST WEEK’S PAPER from the British Medical Journal (The Illusion of Evidence Based Medicine — a topic I have personally tackled DOZENS OF TIMES over the past three decades) cannot help but make me at least ponder whether La Quinta Columna and others who’ve joined the ‘Brotherhood of the Blacklisted’ are over the target.
Once you start to realize that graphene can be used, according to peer-reviewed studies, both in micro-router technology and as a micro-antenna (I warned you we would circle back to “conductivity“), it can really make one’s head start to spin. Particularly in light of scientific papers like THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS or…. too many others to mention or list.
HERE is the video synopsis by Delgado as well as a PATENT EXPOSE ON POTENTIAL GRAPHENE IN COVID VACCINES (AND STILL ANOTHER) by former Pfizer employee, Karen Kingston, via PEG nanolipids. In this case the ‘fact–checking‘ is as interesting as the videos themselves. HERE is the PubMed search for “PEG Graphene”. HERE is a 1,000 page treatise on the subject by an elite researcher…..
By the way, BMJ concluded thusly….
“We may be looking at a systemic failure of unknown proportions.“
Disturbing to be certain, but then again, the New England Journal of Medicine recently published a study (Protection Against Covid-19 by BNT162b2 Booster Across Age Groups) inadvertently revealing that when it comes to studies on the covid vaccines, they are all erroneous (HERE). All? yes, all.
Unfortunately, answering the question as to why there might be graphene in the covid vaccinations gets even weirder thanks to the work of the ever-influential World Economic Forum (WEF) of Davos, Switzerland and its founder, Klaus Schwab. Do not minimize the fact that many consider Schwab to be the world’s single most influential person.
If you try to answer the “why” question, you will invariably be led back to the WEF and it’s pet project, the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Schwab and those who make up the WEF (high level government officials, thought leaders, academics, CEOs of large and powerful industries, as well as lots of rich and famous folk, including certain highly-influential celebrities) routinely lecture and write openly about the goals of said project — a project better-known by its other names, Building Back Better or THE GREAT RESET.
It was Schwab’s protege, Canada’s very own Justin Trudeau, who, in the early days of the pandemic, pitched the UN the idea of using covid to implement its “AGENDA 2030” a decade early — 30 SECOND VIDEO CLIP OF THE ZOOM ADDRESS). Schwab, Trudeau, and the thousands of society’s establishment celebrities who are part of the WEF’s ‘Young Global Leaders‘ program want to help usher in a new utopia of peace and prosperity. It all sounds perfectly wonderful until you find out that the new utopia (the OLD UTOPIAS didn’t work out so well) revolves around something called “transhumanism“.
What in the world does something that sounds like it’s straight off the pages of one of the science-fiction paperbacks I grew up reading have to do with the possibility that there is graphene in the
heavily-pushed heavy-handedly pushed covid vaccines? Allow me to give you some chilling CHERRY-PICKED tidbits from Klaus Schwab’s 2016 best-selling book, The Fourth Industrial Revolution…..
The Fourth Industrial Revolution is characterized by a range of new technologies that are fusing the physical, digital and biological worlds, impacting all disciplines, economies and industries, and even challenging ideas about what it means to be human…. [These] technologies will not stop at becoming part of the physical world around us—they will become part of us….. Indeed, some of us already feel that our smartphones have become an extension of ourselves. Today’s external devices—from wearable computers to virtual reality headsets—will almost certainly become implantable in our bodies and brain… active implantable microchips that break the skin barrier of our bodies…. implanted devices will likely also help to communicate thoughts normally expressed verbally through a ‘built-in’ smartphone, and potentially unexpressed thoughts or moods by reading brain waves and other signals…. intrude into the hitherto private space of our minds, reading our thoughts and influencing our behavior. As capabilities in this area improve, the temptation for law enforcement agencies and courts to use techniques to determine the likelihood of criminal activity, assess guilt or even possibly retrieve memories directly from people’s brains will increase. Even crossing a national border might one day involve a detailed brain scan to assess an individual’s security risk.
How many of you are aware that this technology is already being used to create “SUPER SOLDIERS” for militaries around the world (INCLUDING OURS) (ESPECIALLY OURS)? The only thing that sounds crazier (can anyone say MINORITY REPORT?) is the revelation by Schwab’s top science advisor and sidekick, Israel’s Dr. Doctor Yuval Noah Harari, that this is not the plan for the future. Nope; he indicates that it’s already here and currently in use (HERE & HERE are the short videos; this quote comes from the second, and HERE is a half hour worth of absolutely insane quotes from the pair)……
“People could look back in a hundred years and identify the coronavirus epidemic as the moment when a new regime of surveillance took over, especially surveillance under the skin, which I think is the most important development of the 21st century. This ability to hack human beings, to go under the skin, collect biometric data, analyze it, and understand people better than they understand themselves. By hacking organisms, elites may gain the power to re-engineer the future of life itself“.
If this really is the future that the ‘elites‘ have planned for us, Orwell may have been more correct than he possibly imagined when he wrote this sentence in 1949’s 1984……. “If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face – forever.” At the very least, Harari’s vision provides the final piece of the puzzle for those who excitedly envision an Orwellian utopia based on 24/7/365/internal/external government ‘surveillance‘.
After all, in their ‘Brave New World,’ love is hate, war is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength.
It was six years ago today I warned my readers that “VACCINE WARS” (including the mRNA vaccines) were on the horizon. The fact that there are between 300 and 500 vaccines currently in R&D, coupled with an overwhelming amount of information on melding graphene-based computer nano-technology with graphene-based vaccine nano-technology, and then interfacing it with all aspects of biological systems (BRAIN AND NERVOUS SYSTEMS INCLUDED), should at least lead us to wonder what’s really going on? Not to mention ask whether or not it’s a future that’s best for ourselves or our children.