nascar, the nra, big pharma, and the opioid epidemic

WHY LOBBYING SHOULD
PROBABLY BE ILLEGAL

Pharmaceutical Lobbying

OpenClipart

Don’t hate me because I like to shoot.  Truth is, even the most ardent anti-gunners enjoy target shooting if they’ll actually give it a try.  In fact, although I know they’re out there, I’ve never met one that doesn’t.  Shortly after being appointed to the SCOTUS, Elena Kagan was befriended by the late Justice Antonin Scalia, who introduced her to guns and a wide array of shooting sports — target shooting at the range, sporting clays (traps / skeet), deer and antelope hunting, as well as various sorts of bird hunting (quail, duck, etc).  Doubtful she’s an NRA member, but I suppose stranger things have happened.

Speaking of the NRA, between 1998 and 2015, they spent somewhere between 2 and 2.5 million dollars a year on lobbying (HERE).  Doesn’t sound like so much to me, particularly in light of what we’ve recently learned it costs to bend the ear of a certain past Secretary of State.  Any way you look at it, it’s small potatoes compared to what BIG PHARMA is spending on lobbying.   If we simply look at the makers of opioids as their own entity (as opposed to looking at the entire pharmaceutical industry), we learn that they’ve spent many times more, knowing good and well that an EPIDEMIC OF OPIOD ADDICTION was in full swing. 

  • Opioid drugmakers including Purdue Pharma, the maker of OxyContin, spent more than $880 million, or roughly $98 million per year, on lobbying and campaign contributions that included efforts to support the drugs.
  • Drugmakers and allied advocacy groups employed a yearly average of 1,350 lobbyists in legislative centers.
  • In 2015 alone, 227 million opioid prescriptions were given out in the US, or “enough to hand a bottle of pills to nine out of every 10 American adults.”
  • Purdue Pharma, the company that makes OxyContin, made $2.4 billion from opioid sales last year alone.

Gulp!  This is exactly why you can’t trust EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE.  It’s all too often bought and paid for — just like our politicians.  In fact, what we really need to do is require politicians to dress like NASCAR drivers.  Ever noticed how NASCAR drivers and their cars are covered with the names and logos of their sponsors?  The bigger the sponsorship, the bigger the logo.  Only instead of Home Depot, Great Clips, Tide, or any of a myriad of other businesses, we would have members of congress in their three-piece suits or dresses, with the Purdue Pharma, GLAXOSMITHKLINE, or PFIZER logos printed on them.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Share on reddit
Reddit

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *