FLU SHOTS LINKED TO MISCARRIAGES
“Spontaneous abortion was associated with influenza vaccination in the preceding 28 days. The association was significant only among women vaccinated in the previous influenza season.”
There are several things I find intriguing about this study. The first thing you must realize is that even MAINSTREAM MEDICAL DOCTORS are starting to holler about the fact that our nation’s flu vaccination policies are a scam. Despite what the government tells you, theses shots are not much more than 0% effective (see above link). On top of that, we know that if you got a shot last year, the efficacy of your shot this year will be significantly worse (HERE). And number three, despite the study’s lead author saying there’s no explanation for this, why would we be surprised for even for one second that intentionally putting toxic elements into the bodies of pregnant women (ALUMINUM, MERCURY, MSG, and God only knows what else), wouldn’t result in higher levels of spontaneous abortion?
For Pete’s sake, doctors themselves advise women to avoid virtually all drugs while pregnant. But we are supposed to believe that the toxic milieu found in most vaccines doesn’t count or matter? It amazes me how many studies there are linking environmental pollution and toxicity to things like AUTISM and spontaneous abortion, yet we are repeatedly told that flu shots are safe for expecting mothers. And all this to attempt to prevent a “disease” that’s essentially a bad cold. We have lost our collective minds! You bet we have.
An article from the University of Minnesota’s CIDRAP (Study Signals Association Between Flu Vaccine, Miscarriage) quoted the study’s author as saying, “There’s no biological basis for this phenomenon.” Really? Let’s look at the conclusion of Neil Miller’s well-bibbed study (Infant Mortality Rates Regressed Against Number of Vaccine Doses Routinely Given: Is There A Biochemical or Synergistic Toxicity?) in this month’s issue of Human & Experimental Toxicology back in 2011. The author’s conclusions?
“The US childhood immunization schedule requires 26 vaccine doses for infants aged less than 1 year, the most in the world, yet 33 nations have better IMRs. Using linear regression, the immunization schedules of these 34 nations were examined and a correlation coefficient of 0.70 (p < 0.0001) was found between IMRs and the number of vaccine doses routinely given to infants [this is a crazy high CC]. When nations were grouped into five different vaccine dose ranges (12–14, 15–17, 18–20, 21–23, and 24–26), 98.3% of the total variance in IMR was explained by the unweighted linear regression model. These findings demonstrate a counter-intuitive relationship: nations that require more vaccine doses tend to have higher infant mortality rates.”
If you are as old as I am (HERE), you’ll realize that it was not that long ago that pregnant women were warned against any drugs or vaccinations. If this topic interests you, you might want to read DR. DAVID MIHALOVIC’S 2011 article called Study Shows Influenza Vaccines Cause Spontaneous Abortions and Stillbirths. What you have to remember is that any time statistics from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is used in a study, beware.
Mountains of research (HERE, HERE, HERE, and HERE) have repeatedly shown that AE’s (‘adverse events’) are only reported to the proper authorities about 1% of the time. Is it any wonder that FEMALE HEALTHCARE WORKERS are declining their flu shots in droves? That is until GOVERNMENT-MANDATES (your congressmen / women were probably successfully lobbied by BIG PHARMA) forced these vaccinations on healthcare workers (HERE). Not surprisingly, the CIDMAP article ended with the lead authors of the study making what amounts to an insincere and cheesy-sounding plea to pregnant women — “this study in no way suggests reversing or revising the CDC’s recommendations pertaining to pregnant women and flu shots.“
If you want to see all the posts I’ve written, not only on Flu Shots, but on VACCINES IN GENERAL, as well as vaccines as related to autism, just click the links in this post. You might not agree with me, but once you realize the sorts of chicanery going on in the biomedical research community (code word: “EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE“), I won’t be surprised if you change your mind. Just make sure to spend some time studying this issue using materials and studies not created by people wanting to force this stuff on you and your family for financial gain! And in response to the title of Helen Braswell’s quote from the top of the page; don’t worry Helen, they’ll quickly figure out a way to redo the study to get the results they want. Just remember that the VACCINE INDUSTRY always figures out how to tip the scales in their favor.